I voted no because I don't think that is a good award. People would post crap to get the award. We are open to other suggestions of awards but I think this one would not be good.
I agree! Utilize the system already in place. I for one am disappointed by the way this site is slowly turning to shit over the trolling/spamming tendencies of a few. This site is supposed to be a celebration of the Chicago Bears first and foremost, not a chaotic cesspool of self-promotion. Get your own site/blog/page for that, baby!
REP!
__________________
Gifts:
"To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men." Abraham Lincoln
I agree! Utilize the system already in place. I for one am disappointed by the way this site is slowly turning to shit over the trolling/spamming tendencies of a few. This site is supposed to be a celebration of the Chicago Bears first and foremost, not a chaotic cesspool of self-promotion. Get your own site/blog/page for that, baby!
REP!
I agree with the above and what 4th said and not to mention there already awards given out that the same people are always getting anyway the awards are not a popularity contest to see who can win the most awards they are for fun!
__________________
Gifts:
Last edited by Chicagobear1223; 04-23-2007 at 10:04 AM.
I agree with the above and what 4th said and not to mention there already awards given out that the same people are always getting anyway the awards are not a popularity contest to see who can win the most awards they are for fun!
Yes, and the 'fun' is being lost.
REP!
__________________
Gifts:
"To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men." Abraham Lincoln
I know but I dont think there was a vote on it, so now there is
Exsactly.... This site would go down the drain in almost every department... So i say "no".... With whores...all the forums would be stocked up with nonsence junk...and no1 would be able to get around! It would be like drving in a hyway or a street to driving in a jungle....i think u get my point... Cant imagine the mess though